Guardian Chalkboards: A Tottenham Hotspur analysis
February 8, 2009 Leave a comment
Guardian.co.uk is my homepage on Firefox and so probably the news source i consult more than any otther. I mean, I don’t think an internet session goes by where I do not look at the BBC but nothing on Granuaid Sropt escapes my view.
I listen to their podcasts, read their minute-by-minutes (and attempt to ape them when doing live reports myself) and items such as “Classic Youtube” and “Our favourite things this week” are amazing time killers.
However they have surpassed themselves this time…

I realise this is a chalkboard for the American version of football, but you get the point.
…with the introduction of their football chalkboard technology. Anyone who reads the paper will see this analysis being done by an ex-pro, Gerry Francis and David Pleat most often, but now they have extended it to the readers as well.
At first glance it appears rather superfluous but scratch the surface and football geeks everywhere will be re-joicing.
So fair it only extends to Premiership clubs but if it was on Sky Sports it would simply cover the ***Big Four*** so let’s be thankful for the Guardian’s more socialist approach.
My initial reaction was to compare what I think is the best Tottenham performance in the past couple of years, with maybe the worst, against the same team anyway.
In Feb 2007, the 4-0 home loss to Manchester United was a total capitulation and one of the worst second half performances in my time as a season ticket holder. Fair enough the visitors were very good but Spurs just tolled over and died.
12 months later and we had a different team and a new manager. It was in the period before everyone decided Ramos (currently enjoying a very successful spell at Real Madrid) was complete rubbish and the players were behind him. Ignoring the last minute equaliser, the true sign of what made United champions that year, it was probably my favourite game at home in my time as a regular.
We competed all over the park, the debuting Alan Hutton was immense, we closed them down all over the pitch and full deserved a victory. Shortly afterwards we beat Chelsea in the Carling Cup final and thought we were finally headed in the right direction. Oh Tottenham…
Looking at the stats, they actually make for interesting reading. In terms of pure passes we were not as dominant as I remembered but I think the graphic I have linked to above is a good demonstration. Some points I noticed:
- The amount made in the second game was almost double, and seeing as Berba made almost half on his own in the first game it again highlights the effort of the side.
- Hutton made five interceptions. I said he had a great debut and this is an example but he was clearly helped by the workrate of Aaron Lennon and then latterly Kevin-Prince Boateng. Compare this to the first game and only Malbranque (with one) made an interception in the deep wide areas.
- In the draw, our midfield two of Jenas and Huddlestone had clearly defined roles with Thudd covering a lot of ground in a deeper role while Jenas pressed higher up the pitch. In the loss, only Thudd from our midfield made any interceptions (two) and then they were in sporadic positions.
I could go on forever but, in short, I love these tools and will probably spend a silly amount of time on then in the coming weeks. After today’s north London derby, I shally fully analyse the reasons for our dismal defeat / glorious victory.

This is the stand I was based in, and by far the best of all four sides.
Alright, handsome.



I typed ‘Soccer geek’ into Google images and strangely this came up. It’s not hugely appropriate but made me laugh anyway.
Mr Mowbray, I saulte your admirable but ultimately unsuccessful attitude to the Premiership.
